Dedicated to learning how to appreciate architecture and design buildings. Ian is an architect and tutor at various universities.
Dedicated to learning how to appreciate architecture and design buildings. Ian is an architect and tutor at various universities.
4 comments:
Oh, maybe I meant you when I said, "Any marks for this?" in my post on the TOP TEN BOARD.
My dear Celdrick, are you enjoying the course?
You must have looked at your Mark I from afar and critically listed what was "good" and "not so good" about it, right? Well that's called "reflection and re-evaluation". So we want you to present that as well. Tell us about what dawned on you after you'd finished Mark I, and how you intelligently went into Mark II resolved to discard or improve on the "not so good", and to keep and develop the "good". That's not so difficult, is it?
Hehe..i really enjoy it, but not really satisfy for my final product, hehe..mayb not really good enuf(if compare to other students). But what done is done, now have to face the problem which is coming towards me. The presentation!!...Anyway..can i kno wat the different about the value added to original and reflection and reevaluiation???It is bcoz, when we reevaluate our design that means we added value on it already, rihgt???
Value add means you add value, make it better than before. (Not necessarily better than other student's proposals, just better than what yours was before.)
Post a Comment