After being shot down by Ian over msn that day...A whole new approach towards added issues of context, social & typological concept of the Market building.........
Followed by Ian's everlasting demands... n more demands...
endorphIAN says:but you should perhaps explore something more "open ended"
endorphIAN says:and indeterminate
endorphIAN says:where the boundaries are less defined
endorphIAN says:vague
endorphIAN says:unsettling
endorphIAN says:amorphous
endorphIAN says:undefined
endorphIAN says:you will then be playing with ambiences which are less "controlled" by precedence and precedents
endorphIAN says:and in that sense will "accept more ppl"
endorphIAN says:more types of ppl
endorphIAN says:something more democratic
endorphIAN says:At the spatial and morphology level it would be more dynamic (as opposed to static)
endorphIAN says:and therefore more engaging
endorphIAN says:My first comment is that if you gather all the spaces into a kinda overall cuboid confine
endorphIAN says:it will tend to read like a confined cuboid
endorphIAN says:learn from all the lessons of deconstruction
endorphIAN says:lose the cuboid
endorphIAN says:explode and twist and turn
endorphIAN says:and contort
advice listened to & understood..
The whole frame/matrix idea started off from my interpretation on the logical concept of territory/boundary/division within Market's open plan, which although is defined, yet vague to the max.
And now the structure STILL serves solely as the interpretation of boundary/gap/distance/enclosure etc. in this conceptual model.
What is probably to be done now is to take this 'matrix structure' further away from merely interpreting the original idea, to something more.. more possibilities...
What is probably to be done now is to take this 'matrix structure' further away from merely interpreting the original idea, to something more.. more possibilities...
Make it mean more, do more, add MORE.....
..well it's just what i think..
(written on 4th Oct, night)
No comments:
Post a Comment