Saturday, 19 April 2008

MOVING ON THE GROUND

On March 15, 2008 Fred, Kelvin and I visited one of my houses under construction.
(edited, so the pic nos. do not quite tie up...sorry.)














The house is a kinda equatorial memory with contemporary pretensions. There are tall windows and timbery eaves with large expanses of glass on the eastern side where all the water is, as the luopan (geomancy compass) directed. Pic 3 shows a vista from the Guest Room in front through the moated dining platform to the Den and the Study Corner beyond. No doors at either end so the qi is contained.

Pic 4: View of the Main Lounging Areas with the koi pool at the foot of the staircase in the foreground. A laminated glass floor will take you across the pool, lit at night to show the koi swimming underfoot.
















Pic 5 shows the koi pool at the foot of the staircase.

The Dining Platform is in fact a double-height space with the staircase on one side and a kinda corridor on the First Floor that takes you to the 3 bedrooms at the rear. The corridor bypasses a glass-sided airwell on one side and the void over the Dining on the other (Pic 6).












Standing on the corridor you will look down to the dining area (Pic 7) which is surrounded by the koi pool.
The Master Bedroom at the front of the First Floor will look out onto a roof garden (Pic 8)









Walking up the glass sided staircase (Pic 10) you will look down at the koi pool with Dining Platform centrestage. (Those affected by vertigo beware.)













Pic 11 shows the attic roof under construction (15 March), and Pic 12 the same with the timber-strip ceiling in place (18 April).
We're moving on, Guys. And all those sleepless nights will be worth it when one day you see your dreams on the ground rising in far more spectacular fashion than this modest house you see here.
Enjoy your sem break, ya? And come back fully charged. (To charge at us.)
[pix: kelvin yong & ian ng]

SIDEWALK PROPOSAL KUALA LUMPUR

Basic Setchup images without the "latest soft textured renderings" would still be ok as the minimum submission outcome. They do tell your story pretty efficiently. The example here is about the idea of screening, tansparency, greening, natural lighting, semi-public space, storm protection, ease of maintenance. advertising support, light-touch addition, and a bit of lightheartedness. You'll probably want to choose a colour scheme that stands somewhere between Pleasant and Shocking.












SIDEWALK PROPOSAL, KUALA LUMPUR, 2007 by Arkitek Inasreka
sketchup by Yong Hui Ying & Hui Jing

Thursday, 17 April 2008

ABID'S ART GALLERY, MALACCA, 2007



Hi Guys.. remember the CONCRETE & STONE lecture I gave in Penang? I recall that the projected images of Abid's Malacca Gallery had ghastly colours as the laptop was switched to some undesireable mode.

Well, here they are again, in full colour, the way they appeared to me on the laptop screen. Brilliant!

I thought that now would be a good time to present you with a sight for SORE eyes. A good benchmark, too.

Enjoy! & Kudos Abid!










































Sunday, 13 April 2008

TUE 15.4 AND THURS 17.4 TUTORIALS

Unit 5, these will be the last 2 official tutorials, so to let u know what to expect...

Trial runs for verbal presentations will be optional--for those who want to test themselves and get some feedback. You r encouraged to have a go, but i'm making it optional as i know you have a heavy submission schedule going on the whole week. You don't have to show your whole design for the trial run. Just pinning up something as a reference for your verbal presentation will do. The idea is to test your nerves and your sustained and coherent speech for say 3 to 5 mins. We'll start at 10am on Tue. Remaining times will be for individual tutorials.

Unlikely that there'll be much time for tutorials on Thurs as it's pin up and grading time for the last 5% before we break.

I'm in on Wednesday 16.4 as well as I'm standing in for Keith, doing his Unit.

Elsewhere, as usual, I'm available here and at the other usual places at the other usual times.

Keep going, All. It'll all be worth it!

Saturday, 12 April 2008

ANSWERS TO THE PUZZLE

OK, Guys...better to post this near perfect draft rather than try to get it perfect and lose it altogether.

This quiz is based on what i was shown by you guys up to the time of posting the puzzle. Some of you may of course have changed your schemes (for the better) since then. The similes and metaphors that hit me in the face are not criticisms of your designs at all--just auto images conjured up by one peculiar mind. Thanks for being so wonderfully entertaining with your bright design concepts!

1. the building will appear to flex itself, like Rubik’s snake

OBVIOUSLY BENSON’S. So easy...not fair!







2. my building will appear to move, like a walking insect

HWA LIK’S without a doubt
Incidentally the first pic is the album cover of the original sound track (long before the recent movie) narrated by the late actor Richard Burton. If you want to know how English should be spoken, grab that lp.)



3. like grandma’s Everest

SAY NO MORE---JON’S.

Grandmas visiting his original 5 level sky-view visitor centre will feel they have to climb Mt. Everest to get to what Jon’s on about. And even if they make it half of them will die of heart attacks up there. In which case the clue is still correct. They will be laid to Rest forEver somewhere in the plaza just outside his centre.










4. it will be quite a startling structure, like a useful Hiroshima

EURIC’S.
Sad, sad, sad…Hiroshima 1945. With pics of the victims of that atomic present. NEVER AGAIN!
Euric’s scheme, of course, fantastic though it might be, and a bit iconic and dreamy, has a wonderful precedent in the (proposed but not built) scheme in KL not so long ago. Somebody proposed a long snake-like tube of a commercial building over and along the Sg. Klang from the city centre to somewhere where Megamall is. Hovering over the river with legs that straddled each bank. I wish they’d built it. Euric will have a battle coming up with the jury. No problem. Just get your ammunition ready.


5. the experience for visitors will be like a stroll through Hades
JOHNEY SCARHEAD’S.

A subtle difference here. Hades is originally the Greek Hell, which the Christians took over to carry on the idea of Hell. So it’s Greco-Christian and not Taoist. So Effigies (Eugene’s) which are mainly Chinese would, though plausible, not be an accurate answer. And Johney’s scheme, if you’ve seen it, required you to actually walk across a bridge over the road to view the graveyard and then double back to look at some more coffins, etc. What a walk! (But he might have refined it by now.)

6. you might say my form is unusual, like a television sandwich

JINNO’S.

Everyone’s favorite…because it makes us all so hungry. In the old days this would not be such a good clue, but now with flatscreen and plasma and lcd screens and all…..

7. like an evolving shop house

HUI LIH’S.

You need to see the link between the fossilized and the new thing. And she has kept one old shophouse almost all intact, half renovated the next one before taking you into the new one next to the road. Enough evolution there for me, I reckon.

8. my building will make you smile as you think of a happier party in Boston

ROY’S.



The Boston Tea Party was an act of direct action by the American colonists against Great Britain in which they destroyed many crates of tea bricks on ships in Boston Harbor. The incident, which took place on Thursday, December 16, 1773, has been seen as helping to spark the American Revolution. (From Wikipedia)

…which of course led to the formation of the USA. War, as always, is never a happy thing. But our dear clever little friend, Roy Jak Hui, has come up with a delightful little tea visitor centre where the experience of tea drinking and tea packing happens in box-like houses randomly lined up along a bridge by the waterside. Thus, evoking those tea boxes floating in water that you see in the classic picture above. If he knows how to present it (and doesn’t come down with dengue or red, red stuff) then he’s headed for the sky. Clever little rascal!


9. like a maypole dance gone awry (haha)

VIDHYA’S.
Lots of slim spaces. I hope she pulls it off. You know what I mean. Awry because the ribbon spaces are not quite as ‘organized’ as the ribbons in the dance below…as if a storm had struck. But a dynamic composition, nevertheless, is hers.



10. like a pulmonary offering at Thaipusam

JOSHUA’S.
Of course. I’d already given the game away at the workshop tutorial when I said this infill project is a bit like a heart transplant. And the glass tubes of his (clever things to fill them with incense smoke) reminded me so much of those skewers in the second picture. And why not? We’re multicultural here. Esp.in Penang. [2nd pic is of skewer poking the tongue of a thaipusam devotee. Can't upload or the blog will crash again.] [Just added 2nd pic, sun 13 apr 08 8.55pm]

11. my building will be entertaining in itself, like the home of the woman who lived in a shoe

HAYDEN’S.

Hahaha. What more can I say? See how the toe part of the shoe crosses the street to touch your famous Triangle? Haha.




12. I am very conscious of relating to my neighbors: my building will be as gregarious as a kissing gourami

MAO YANG’S.
Ah! This one! It’s NOT a toss up between Kelvin’s and Mao Yang’s. If you’ve studied their plans---which I had the pleasure of doing---you’ll see that Mao Yang has his bits (like gourami lips) of his First Floor plan touching the back wall of the shophouses. The idea is to allow the shophouse owners to actually sell nyonya kuih and crafts over a counter to the visitors strolling in the Centre. The counters would have roller shutters for security during closing hours. The interaction between residents and visitors is win-win. “You spy into my house, taste my kuih, but pay me la. And free smells for the Centre.” Olfactory experiences are part of the poetic experience. (Have you lazy fellas read Juhani Pallasmaa’s ‘Hapticity and Time’ yet?)


Now, can somebody post everyone’s score here? How many upon 12?

Friday, 11 April 2008

PRESENTATION CONFIDENCE 1/2

CONFIDENCE (1/2):

No reading required, no writing needed, no speaking necessary; in fact, you just have to be still and quiet for this one.

Come, come, you say, surely you’d need a mountain of knowledge and months of practice to possess a molehill of confidence, to be able to stand before a blaze of staring eyes and deliver your thoughts without fear of being blender-ed at the end.

Well, in a sense, yes. It helps to have as many facts as you can gather on the subject. And, sure, you get steadier with every repetition…of the same act (familiarity breeds…nothing new.) You can’t shirk your homework, I agree—organizing your thoughts on paper, getting your show material neatly labeled and arranged, equipment in working order, enough sleep, clothes, etc.

But I wonder how many of us have experienced doing all that and still getting that familiar sinking feeling when the day draws near. I know I have.

And it’s not just nervousness. Some nervous energy when you’re about to go on stage is a good thing (speaking from experience). It keeps you focused and ready.

That feeling is about confidence, or more accurately its absence…just when we need it most.

So, why does it happen? And how do we get it?

It’s a mind thing.

Psychologists tell us that imagining the worse that could happen can dispel the Goliath of fear. Ask yourself, so they tell us, “What’s the worse that could possibly happen?”

And answer the question comprehensively: “Well, I could get tongue tied, no words will come out; I will blush or turn white; the audience will start laughing; the jury will give me zero; I will faint and fall over; my friends will call me lame; I will fail and go back to Seminyih to rear chickens; etc.

Then ask yourself, “So what?”

And answer yourself, “Who cares? There’s more to life than architecture! My girlfriend/boyfriend will still love me; my family (although poorer) will still welcome me home; I will still have 2 hands and 2 legs; the sun will still shine; the birds will still…
(Remember I said you had to be still for this one?)

You will get to a point when you slap yourself and say, “Don’t be b***** stupid!” Why? “Because it won’t get to that!”

And you will be right. It won’t get that ridiculous!

Quite simply, one of the jury will probably ask you a simple question to help you on. Jury and audience aren’t there to mince you: they usually want to know about your interesting scheme and cheer you on.

Towards the end of 2006 I was the sole juror for a Studio 4 boy at his finals. With great enthusiasm I opened with, “Well now, Young Man, tell me what’s so exciting about your scheme!” (Ya, with my usual booming voice.)

That short and thin student (yes, VS product, quite obviously) stared at me with rounded eyes and opened mouth. After a while I thought that, perhaps, he hadn’t understood the question. So I fired away, “Take us through your building and show us all the fascinating things!”

But he had already turned to stone.

I looked at Puan Nor, his tutor. She looked like a Muslim Madonna—smiling serenely. So I turned back to the statue and picked up his model. Slowly and calmly I said, “This is one of the best schemes I’ve seen in many years.” The statue didn’t move. “Here, on this elevation we see one of the finest Late Modern interpretations of the brise soleil. And the language of fins and planes are modulated and carried sensitively over the roof to the other side. And yet there’s no repetition…just an artful expression in myriad variation…”

Puan Nor said to him, “See, see! I told you it was good….” The poor boy didn’t blink.

So for 5 minutes, as he stared into my eyes, I did his presentation for him. I didn’t ask him any more questions. He said not a single word throughout his presentation. I think I gave him a B+ (can’t quite remember). He’s in Melbourne or somewhere now.

Loss of confidence? No. Absolutely NO confidence.

I guess he didn’t know about what psychologists tell us, to start with.

And just in case some of you are planning to try this Silent Style of presentation….I have only one thing to say to you—“You’d better watch out!”

Well, taking you mind through the worst imaginable is the Defense Tactic of gaining confidence. This must be accompanied by the Attack Strategy. That will be the next part. It’s time for breakfast with my son now.

cont:- 2/2

Monday, 7 April 2008

PRESENTATION LANGUAGE 4/4

LANGUAGE (4/ 4)

Ok, let’s see if you’ve absorbed anything at all...haha!. Here’s a puzzle...

I can imagine presenting some of your Visitor Centres with the following similes and metaphors. I want you to try to guess whose schemes they are. (This will also test how closely you’ve been watching your colleagues’ work...haha!) Post here. Top 3 guys with the highest scores---I’ll buy you lunch on Thursday.

1. the building will appear to flex itself, like Rubik’s snake

2. my building will appear t move, like a walking insect

3. like grandma’s Everest

4. it will be quite a startling structure, like a useful Hiroshima

5. the experience for visitors will be like a stroll through Hades

6. you might say my form is unusual, like a television sandwich

7. like an evolving shop house

8. my building will make you smile as you think of a happier party in Boston

9. like a maypole dance gone awry (haha)

10. like a pulmonary offering at Thaipusam

11. my building will be entertaining in itself, like the home of the woman who lived in a shoe

12. I am very conscious of relating to my neighbors: my building will be as gregarious as a kissing gourami

I’ll post my answers Wednesday midnight, 9 April (or maybe Thursday 10 April before I nip off to college.) All of Studio 3 can join in. Have fun!

PRESENTATION LANGUAGE 3/4

LANGUAGE (3/ 4)

3.) WRITE WRITE WRITE: Ok, you may not have expected this, but writing is the big brother of reading. It forces you to cough up the words—like a school bully demands your pocket money. You can’t let your mind wander when you have to put thoughts on paper or screen. Once done, everyone can examine your thoughts objectively. And of course your writing can be redrafted for effectiveness. You can craft your language. In crafting your work, you discipline your thinking; and fitter thinking shows itself in more articulate expression.

Grab every chance to express yourself in writing—other than your dreaded essays and reports, there’s your messaging on net: blog posts, emails, etc. Make it a habit. It doesn’t take long, but write often, get used to the keys. Force yourself to express opinions. Doesn’t matter how silly you might think they are…nobody’s assessing

A word about sms and msn: they’re fun and have a language of their own (which I thoroughly enjoy and am learning daily…guess from whom…haha!) but you need to pay greater attention to your skills in formal, academic, or even plain, expression for the purposes that lie ahead—your college and future office work.

4.) THE ONE THING: If I had to choose one aspect of the English language that helps distinguish English from most other languages (or at least from all the languages I know) I’d have the say DOUBLE MEANINGS. I’m mentioning this in conclusion because this is the one thing which—once you master it, or at least get comfortable with it—will open your mind’s door to a treasure chamber of the gems of the language. Better yet, you will really begin to enjoy expressing yourself in English. You will wield simile, metaphor, figurative speech, idiom, symbolism, imagery, allegory as happily as you click your chopsticks or finger-spoon your nasi kandar.

Let me show you what I mean….. (with the simplest—and most fun of the lot!—similes.)
In her award winning book, The God of Small Things (Flamingo, London, 1997) Southern Indian writer Arundhati Roy used similes (and metaphors) to stunning effect. Up until the time I picked up her book I had never seen so many similes in one small novel, never been so entertained by so remarkable and playful a use of the English language. She well deserved the 1997 Booker Prize.

You’d be lucky to find a few similes per chapter in your ordinary novel, but by Page 9 of her 300+ page book she’d already used 7.

Here’s how her writer’s eyes see ordinary things.

Page 1) Falling Rain: Slanting silver ropes slammed into loose earth, ploughing it up like gunfire.

Page 1) Roof: The old house on the hill wore its steep, gabled roof pulled over its ears like a low hat.

Page 4) Corpse’s Face: Her face was pale and as wrinkled as a dhobi’s thumb for being in water too long.

Page 4) Mourners In Church: …the yellow church swelled like a throat with the sound of sad singing.

Page 5) Grandma’s Tears: Her tears trickled down…and trembled along her jaw like raindrops on the edge of a roof.

Page 6) If An Indian Man Painting A Sky On The Church Ceiling Had Accidentally Fallen Down: …dropping like a dark star out of the sky that he had made. Lying broken on the hot church floor, dark blood spilling from his skull like a secret.

Page 9) Night Insects: Strange insects appeared like ideas in the evenings and burned themselves on Baby Kochama’s dim 40-watt bulbs.

This is not fancy language. It’s strenuous and muscular, like an army taking new territory. (Hehe.) And entirely appropriate for her narrative of the memoirs of a dizygotic twin coming home, and coming to terms with the abuse by a pedophile of her other half, and trying to accept a traumatic tragedy in childhood they both share.

When you begin to get a grip on double meanings—and multiple meanings—when you begin to practise it, like a habit, you will find your listeners absorbed with you, like a date by candlelight. If not absorbed then at least smiling, like a nursing mother. You will connect better. Because you endear your listener—and that’s usually part of the presentation battle won. Equally importantly you will be training your mind to think through a multiplicity of layers, a plethora of disciplines—and merge them—to derive that rich, rich creation that we’re all after in our architecture and in our lives.

Ok, let’s see if you’ve absorbed anything at all...haha!. Here’s a puzzle...

Cont:- part 4/4

PRESENTATION LANGUAGE 2/4

LANGUAGE (2/ 4)

2.) READ READ READ: I Can’t say this more. Reading is the only way to make leaps in improving your language. Other steps only support this basic effort you must make. That’s more difficult nowadays in a culture of the moving electronic image. Why read the book when you can watch the movie?

But you’ve probably heard it said: “The book is so much better than the movie!” And it’s because the written word often captures the imagination better than any image can. Because it reaches every part of your conscious being, touches every part of your memory, your memory not other’s. You paint your personal image of the story. And therefore it connects with you in a way that’s all your own. Sure it’s a chore to plough through ink on paper (or blips on screen). At first. But as Roald Dahl said (in his excellent book, Matilda), “…allow the words to wash over you. Never mind if you don’t understand some of the words at first.” Let the music in. Somehow, it, I guess, tunes you up. (or ‘in’?) Before you know it you’ll find it easier to sing in tune. When you’re starting, don’t bother with reaching for the dictionary for every unknown word: Try to guess the meaning from the context and move on. The meaning will come to you later in the story.

I find it useful to sometimes read aloud (when I’m alone, that is….haha!) It will be strange at first to hear your own voice speaking to yourself…but, heck, the sooner you get to know the new You the better. Let the new You grow. What you’ll actually be doing is synchronizing your thinking with your verbalizing, wiring up your brain to your tongue properly.

WHAT TO READ: Other than everything (including instructions on cartons of cornflakes), I’d say architectural text(s) (AT) and novels. You should have at least one good AT with you all the time, to fill in the loose minutes. Doesn’t matter what text—book, journal, article. AT fill up your knowledge gap as they expose you to language articulation on the career subject you’ve chosen. Go by your interest. ‘How architecture evolved through the ages’? ‘Discussion on a particular architectural movement’? ‘Life and work of a particular architect’? ‘Design Theory’?

Novels are really art forms that parallel architecture. They’re usually long stories, or narratives, with themes, plots, structures, players (protagonists), characterization, styles... You can see that we use these concepts (and this vocabulary) often in architectural discussions. The more you read novels the more you will pick up (usually subconsciously) patterns of narratives. As you lift these patterns up from your subconscious to your conscious mind—with lots of interesting discussions with your friends—you will begin to arm yourself with theoretical frameworks to understand, and better yet, to describe and present your own architectural designs. Along the way, simultaneously, without you knowing, the language will creep into your being. And soon, you’ll find the new You surprising you with it’s maturing presence.

Have a good dictionary, thesaurus, word power manual, and basic English grammar handbook lying around. Use them when a particular word or idiom, or saying, fascinates you. Or flip through them to entertain yourself. But don’t let them get in the way of your enjoyment of the stories.

Cont:- part 3/4

PRESENTATION LANGUAGE 1/4

Ok, Guys, here's the continuation of my article on presentation.

LANGUAGE (1/ 4)

I’m facing writer’s block. ‘What can I say that you don’t already know?’

There are tons of books on “How to Improve your English” which you can find at the local bookstore, hundreds of articles of the same on the net. And you’re probably sick of all the grammar and comprehension advice received during your school days. What can I say here that you will find useful for the day---about 5 weeks from now---when you stand before the external critics to talk about your scheme?

I’m not worried about those of you who are already fairly confident in this area. As for those who do face some difficulty…. perhaps I may be of some help. My observation is that the majority of these went through the vernacular primary school—some even all the way to Form Five. The obstacles you face are common. Those who didn’t go through the vernacular schools (VS) have a different set of problems, if at all. To make this article useful I’m going to address the problem along the VS tributary. Someway along, the other tributary (the National School, or NS, one) will join in naturally.

I’ll have to draw from my own experience. I taught a year of the Remove Class sometime back—classes of VS primary kids on the changeover to NS; I still retain a lot of the ‘smalltown-Chinese-PostEmergencyNewVillage-Muhibbah soul in me…(gulp!) Mine was not your typical KL-PJ middle class urban upbringing; after that it was 4 years trying to adapt to precisely that at St. John’s Inst. Bukit Nanas, KL; then, it was 6 years of total immersion in the English culture; before an immediate return to Here to spend many years squatting around muddy construction sites explaining details to contractors in Cantonese; and hanging out with VS musicians of the erhu, pipa, dixi and yangqing sort—and all for my ability to speak and write clear English. And of course, I kept up ongoing relationships with ppl. who spoke perfect English. So I guess I kinda know what the problem is.

THE GREAT DIVIDE: The main problem vernacular school students (VSS) face is that they think in their V language (VL) as default. They translate their thoughts from VL into English EACH time they have to say something. Although with practice this can be a “workable” system, it faces the disadvantage of a lack of the smooth musicality of English. It just doesn’t flow so well.

You can’t really blame the VSS. All their formative thoughts, emotions and expressions have been in the VL, and to retain their personality in conversation, they have to draw from all these formative substances; and hence the (sometimes tiresome and discouraging) need for translation. It’s like you’re so eager to cross over but the ferry is always late.

And time is so short to overcome it.

1.) TOTAL IMMERSION is easily the most effective way to improve your language. And that means (short of going to England/Australia/NZ/US/Canada) you make a decision now to speak only English, listen to only English, read only English, and—take a load of this—hang out (more) with ppl. who do that...haha. The nearer you can get to doing this 100% the faster you will improve. You will have to consider the practicalities, and make your plan. Is this strategy practicable for the forthcoming finals? A little. Maybe some…depends on how quickly you plunge headlong into it. Whatever, start now for the long term. It basically needs a change of attitude…a resolve to Just Do It!

You will find it funny at first. Your friends will think you’ve gone crazy—“You think your Engran very good ar?”—but that’s the price you’ll have to pay. How badly do you want to improve? But know what? You’ll discover new friendships opening up where you least expect it. There are many bananas in Malaysia.
Cont:- part 2/4

future cities

hey all, dont ask why am i up so late.....to make long story short im an architecture student..

dont know if u guys seen this b4 or not but just sharing with u...so i was going thrh a few archi vids on youtube and found this interesting vid on our future cities. it was an architecture competition in 2006 by the history channel for architects to come up with the craziest of ideas of how our future cities will be like, to be more specific in year 2106 in three us cities which is new york, los n, and chicago.

unfortunately, im computer stupid....and cant figure out how to post vids so here are the two links at the bottom of the vids.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQukt36Gew0&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3hixUzdA3k&feature=related

Sunday, 6 April 2008

Tuesday 8th april session

8.00 Govin
8.20 SunieL
8.40 MeeKei
9.00 Kelvin
9.20 (X) Veron's lecture
9.40 (X)
10.00 (X)
10.20 (X)
10.40 sieutheng
11.00 Ei Ei
11.20 Carey
11.40 Issac
12.00 hui lih & jessmine

Saturday, 5 April 2008

work in progress




































hi everyone...this is my work in progress...do give any pointers if you wish...=)



here is an extract of the write up:



I have decided to make my model much lower. The highest point is only 9m. This is in response to the shophouses around. Although I have the 11 storey high oriental hotel and 5 storey high neighbors, I decided to let them have their stage and I’ll have mine. I retain the idea of having it being intimate to the ground and the streets. Again, it is hidden from drivers and pedestrians traveling along Jalan Penang. But its mass is visible to those traveling along Leith and Chulia Street.

So instead of the skeletal structure that cages the triangle, I am using a different approach. In my crit with Keith recently, (the one I told u he commented that I was ‘whisshy woshy’..haha..) I did mention to him that the triangle, to me, is being over shadowed b everything that is going on around the place. The traffic, the heat, the pedestrians, the batik houses, the Odeon. And the current street furniture there makes things worse. It camouflages the place even more. People treat those stones that have the historic information engraved on it as a stool to rest their butt. We would not even have notice it if we were not looking around for a site. Everything seems to be underneath a blanket. No one seems to be aware of the significance of the site. In fact it is so historic, it should be a part of the heritage trail but it is neglected. Hence the first issue of the site I want to solve. To make the site an interesting communal area, to do something to it to generate interest and awareness without destroying the visual communication between the triangle and the surrounding buildings and between the buildings themselves. So, my building will ‘peel’ off the layer of dust for you to ‘peep’ underneath.

I am building a slab over it, with the bottom offset inside a lil to make it look floating above the site. The trishaw stop is part of the slab, astho it is a part f the triangle that has been peel open and become part of the rest of the visitor centre. Where the old foundations of the police stations were, I will puncture the slab to reveal the stones. To emphasize their existence. the flight of stairs that leads up to the lobby will be extruded out to form stairs like street furniture for people to ‘lepak’ on.

Another point about my form is that, it is fashioned to look like three different buildings-the green patch, the glass atrium and the triangle itself. It is because in essence they can function as three different buildings but they are one visitor centre. The green patch is actually a trishaw and bicycle repair shop, the atrium is actually an art gallery, the triangle is a trishaw stop and station. I will elaborate on this point more later when I talk about the special layout, they are inter-related. They way I orientate building also to echo the existing street fabric of shop houses. The trishaw repair shop and art gallery could very well be ‘shop houses’ by themselves. The trishaw station is an extrusion of that.



Now let me talk more on the special layout.

I decided to not restrict my trishaw trails to just the heritage trail. Trishaws are free and mobile transports can creep into every single back alley. So they can come from everywhere actually. And since my site is fronting such a busy street, open to cars and pedestrians and trishaws, so why not have my entry from the triangle itself right?

Therefore in this new model I allow trishaws to stop underneath the ‘peel’ or inside the centre at ground floor. I also recognize that my visitor centre could get so famous people will come by other means too. Cars and taxi could drop off at the ‘peel’. Buses could just drop them at the triangle itself. Pedestrians will come from everywhere. Visitors can access my centre by two ways. The monumental 5m wide stairs at the triangle; or the stair case at the ground floor of the centre to access the lobby at the mezzanine.

In this attempt I am playing a lot with the use of wide monumental staircases as the attracting factor of my visitor centre. Because I figured for trishaws to have a future the target audience for my centre should be the younger generation. And I realize that there is something attractive about wide staircases to youngsters. People tend to hang around them, sit and lepak, some even eat there. Example: the outdoor fountain of KLCC. Even though youngster are pampered by air conditioning units at home all the time, but people still choose to lepak outside, sitting on steps, they seem to love outdoor lifestyles.

Once visitors come up the stairs, they would be greeted by this huge glass roof. I am planning to add some sun shading devices on the glass, but haven’t thought of it yet. If visitors come from the ground floor they would have to go thru the retail shop / office to get to the lobby. My retail shop is going to be really small as it only sells souvenir items and tickets for trishaw rides.

At the lobby, the reception would be on the left; the retail is on the right. Behind the reception counter are the toilets. In front of you is another flight of stairs. At the front of the stairs are two statues of lions guarding the stairs, just like those you see in a Chinese clan house. But now shorter. And at the end of the stairs you will see this huge traditional silk screen that runs from top to the floor. You can see people behind but you can’t make out what’s happening.

Behind the silk screen is the history chamber. Here I attempt to bring visitors back to the sixties in Penang. All around I am going to hang old door frames, doors, windows, louvers, found all around Georgetown, leaving each one of them the way they were salvaged, yet maintain their colour quality and shape. The result will be this array of colourful collage of colours everywhere in the chamber. All around I will display the traditional trishaw dismantled to show how it was put together in the olden days. At the center of the chamber u will notice panels of fronted glass panels, dimensioned like 22” LCD screens, forming a inverted cylinder, suspended above the eye level. LCD projectors will project images and videos of what it was like before in Penang, explaining the history of trishaws in Penang. So visitors will stand at the center of this cylinder and watch the visuals. It is supposed to be a place where colours collide to bring out the life of the sixties. The chambers will be dimmed, with downlights.

At the corner of the chamber would be an exit that leads visitor to the glass atrium. Here visitors would immediately notice the change of mood. From a place where it was full of life, colours, sound and visual excitement, the atrium is at the other spectrum of emotions. I have shown them what trishaws were, the glory days of yesterdays, now I show them the sad, depressed, bare state of the current trishaw trade in Penang.

First they would notice the immediate change in colours and light. Here in the atrium, it is white washed everywhere, except for the glass curtain. A flush of natural sunlight lights up the center void where a huge scrap metal chandelier – like art piece hangs in mid air. Then they would notice that beyond the sculpture is an open grass plane in an outdoor space beyond. they would then try to locate the entrance to that grass plane. As they start to walk they would notice footprints set into the floor, scattered all around the floor they step on, with the names of who’s the footprints belong to. Then, they lift their heads up and notice the black and white images hung on the walls.

Here I aim to strip the visitors bare of everything that distracts them. To something empty, silent, dead, where everything is just white, and the scrap metal artwork emphasizing death and termination. But then there is something bout the space that seems alive. It’s in the footprints and the black and white images. As they fret on the ramp that goes around the atrium, it is like bringing them to ‘walk in the footsteps’ of the trishaw men. And as they walk down their paths, they see their faces, and in this sea of faces, they see the tragedy, the sorrow and pain, they see the trishaw men’s story thru their eyes, almost as though I want them to feel guilty.

Backtrack to the green patch. This is an optional space for visitors. It is an outdoor area meant to evoke thought. As they travel up the low rap and reach the end, they would be greeted by the streetscape of Penang, from the level of the roof ridges. Here the green patch actually is angled downwards a little. To almost give the feeling of falling over the tip, to those who are unfamiliar with the space. It is meant for visitors to sit and reflect or to just ay back and enjoy the view. What ever the outcome, it is made to be interpreted by the different individuals that visit the space. I am naming the space ‘the Field of Falling Dreams’, by the way. It is related to the poetics of the atrium.

Towards the end of the ramps, visitors would notice the pool underneath, but they can’t get there yet. They would be led into the working area which is also the repair shop. Visitors will encircle the space from a catwalk above. They would be led down to the working space in the end, giving them the option of mingling there a while. But the difference in floor level might suggest otherwise to them, and they will continue their journey forward (that is the whole point anyway, I do not want people gathering and obstructing the work in the space). I figured that now it is not practical to mass produce trishaws at this point of age, so maintenance and repair seems more logical and practical. Therefore my working space is a repair area. Here regular trishaw men can send their trishaws for repair. And visitors can have a closer experience of the lifestyle of a trishaw man.

As visitors proceed, they would end up in the atrium again but now at the ground level. They would notice some inscription on the wall but it is inverted and can only be viewed by looking at the reflection of it from the reflective pool. Basically the inscription tells that the future of the trishaw trade lies in your hands and you are looking at the reflection that person, meaning you, meaning us. They proceed to exit the atrium and they end up back at the ground floor of the visitor centre where the drop off area is. Here visitors can stay and get a ride, mingle around with the trishaw men or take the stairs up to the mezzanine again to the lobby or the retail shop. Their journey ends here.

So here I solve another issue related to my site. My building becomes a home for trishaw men. I create an avenue for them to repair their trishaws, to park and rest while they wait for their customers, and get free publicity. They don’t have to mingle around everywhere, banking on a kind soul to pay them for a ride. Here we sell the trade to the customers, and customers come with an idea of excitement and ready to get a ride. It’s all win. Haha.

My building also contributes to the whole economy as a whole because I am not only further emphasizing trishaws as part of he heritage trail experience, I am adding to it by introducing this controversial plot of heritage land and using it as a station to start and end the heritage trail.

Now back to the idea of ‘3 in 1’. I guess I have made it quite clear how the three buildings co-relate and yet is one. The workshop can be operational even when he visitor centre is closed. The atrium can display different kind of portraits or paintings or even change the sculpture once in a while, as long as it fits the theme and enhances the emotions of the space. So it can be a place for artisans too, for them to contribute to this visitor centre. The station can still function all day even when the visitor centre is closed. It is functional by itself. But yet they are one because they make up the whole visitor centre.

I played a lot with rhythm and duality of spaces, especially duality. I hope it shows in my current design.

I would like to add a little bit on my triangle. I mentioned that I want to make it float right? But in the day it is not very obvious because the building only relies on sunlight to create that shadow and hence the floating effect. And I also mentioned that I let my neighbors have their stage too. I set back my building t the corner, maintaining to visual contact of every shop through the triangle. But at night I take the stage. Neon lights will be installed under the slab, and the lights will make it look even more like its hovering above ground. And uplights will light up my building like a lantern, with my extensive use of glass, it will command a lot of attention into the spaces within the building. But I can only fully express this night scene thru 3d renderings.






******






yea i know this doesnt sound like an extract... ah...dont care... haha...i decided to give you guys the whole thing...haha...



feedback is appreciated...

Tutorials Tues 8 April

8.00
8.20
8.40 MeeKei
9.00 Kelvin
9.20 (X) Veron's lecture
9.40 (X)
10.00 (X)
10.20 (X)
10.40 sieutheng
11.00 Ei Ei
11.20 Carey
11.40 Issac
12.00 hui lih & jessmine
TUTORIALS TUES 8 APRIL
8.00
8.20
8.40
9.00 Kelvin
9.20 (X) Veron's lecture
9.40 (X)
10.00 (X)
10.20 (X)
10.40 sieutheng
11.00 Ei Ei
11.20 Carey
11.40 Issac
12.00 hui lih & jessmine

Friday, 4 April 2008

TUTORIALS TUE 8 APRIL

Unit 5: there will be tutorials as usual except for one important event. I'd like the whole unit to meet @ 1000h for a group discussion on PROGRESS & STRATEGY for the final home run. I reckon it'll take 30 mins or so. So let's clear 2 slots (1000-1040h) for this. We just want to make sure we are all absolutely clear on how to ensure we have all the tools necessary for the best performance possible.

We have just ended Week 12. Final Submission is on Week 17. All Best.

(Additional announcement) Veron & I just had a discussion. She will give a lecture on PRESENTATION STYLES with a PROJECT SUMMARY @ 930h or so to Units 3, 4 & 5. This subject matter may overlap somewhat with Unit 5's PROGRESS & STRATEGY discussion so we'll all have to play it by ear. Let's block off the 920 and 940 slots for her.

Please do not miss Veron's lecture.

Units 1 & 2 need not worry about all this. You have already heard her lecture (that Mon. when I replaced Keith) and she will probably do the PROJECT SUMMARY with you next Mon.

POSTMODERNISM

Portland Public Services Building, Oregon, 1980, by Michael Graves


Re: my conversation with Sook Tin, Hayden, Fred and that rather nice girl from Studio 2 this morning.

Do be careful how you define Postmodernism. It's not as simplistic as "All buildings built after 1945, or 67, or whatever". It's a loose movement with common design intentions that rebelled against the modern movement. Wikipedia's article on Postmodernist Architecture is a good place to set things in perspective.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodern_architecture

ROY & NELLIE

Hi Roy..welcome to the community!

Yup, it might seem like we're at the end of Studio 3 now...but actually for many we're more like somewhere at the top of the hill getting ready for the smooth downslope cruise to the finishing line...haha.

This community can go on beyond Studio 3 if you want...feel free to use it in whatever way you want (well, almost whatever way...haha).

Nellie asked to join up, but I haven't received her email...hope I haven't deleted it while I was clearing up junk mail...haha. Somebody ask her again when you see her, k?

Thursday, 3 April 2008

WELCOME APRIL 2008!

Hi April! Welcome to the blog!
Now how did you know about the egalitarian thingey? Goodness...this net leaks like a sieve!
As you can see, we're all a bit mad here.
Enjoy!

Wednesday, 2 April 2008

8.00
8.20
8.40
9.00
9.20 euric
9.40 hwa lik
10.00 carey
10.20 Issac
10.40 pei ei
11.00 jessmine
11.20 hui lih
11.40 mee kei

INVENTIVENESS AS A PREOCCUPATION (Edward Cullinan)

Doesn't a scheme like this make you salivate?

Looks like a student's scheme.

He's still designing like a student...haha...wonderful man!

I guess he just won't grow old.

http://www.edwardcullinanarchitects.com/

A New Gateway to Petra, Jordan, 2003